黑人的主旋律电影。
美国种族问题神马的从来都不是新闻,而估计是由于某些问题的考量,马丁路德金从来也没有在中国的教科书上大书特书过。
这电影,好的地方,是没有死抓马丁路德金不放,而把视觉也放在了其他普通被人身上。
不过,由于是黑人主旋律电影,白人的角色就...大家懂的。
反正金博士已经死了,或许也是好事,死于壮年,死于名望的巅峰,才能封神。
Response to SelmaLast week, I went to see the movie Selma in the theater. The reason I went to watch this movie is not because I wanted to watch it, but because I needed to get the extra credit for my EWRT 2 English class. Before I went to the theater, I watched the trailer of this movie, so I basically knew that this movie was about Martin Luther King, Jr. I only knew a little bit about Martin Luther King, Jr., who was the leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement and delivered his famous “I have a Dream” speech. I guessed that the movie might be about what happened before and after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s famous speech. After watching the movie, I was surprised because this movie talked more about the speech, and it made me feel touched since it talked about the conflicts, struggles, and feelings of people. I think Selma is an amazing and meaningful movie to watch because of its story, actors, and emotion. The story of this movie talked about how African American people fought for their voting right and freedom by expressing conflicts between different positions of people and feelings of them, so I think this movie is a meaningful movie. In the movie, it basically talked about how Martin Luther King, Jr. appealed to Congress to pass the bill in order to protect the voting right of African American people. Besides, the movie showed a few main characters of the movement in the past, such as, Martin Luther King, Jr., his wife, the thirty-sixth president of the United States, Lyndon B. Johnson, and the governor of Alabama, George Wallace, etc. There were scenes that were showing speeches, demonstrations, and the brutal repressions of police. In addition, there were political conflicts between many different groups of people, such as Martin Luther King, Jr.’s non-violent movement, leaders of students, the President Lyndon B. Johnson’s white house, Alabama’s governor George Wallace, and the police of Selma. Since this movie talks about African Americans fought for their freedom and the right to vote, which is an important political history to Americans; also, people should watch this movie and learn more about Martin Luther King, Jr. and his movement. Selma not only has a good story, but also has a group of amazing actors who tried their best to successfully act their characters. David Oyelowo is the actor who played the role of Martin Luther King, Jr. I do not know how the real Martin Luther King, Jr. looks like. Even though Oyelowo did not particularly copy Martin Luther King, Jr., the way that he gave out the speech had the feeling and momentum of the real Martin Luther King, Jr. Also, Oyelowo really focused on some small details of Martin Luther King, Jr., which made me feel like that Oyelowo was exactly the Martin Luther King, Jr. in the movie. Moreover, Tim Roth played the role of the governor of Alabama, George Wallace. Also, Roth played this character successfully, and some words that he said make me laugh. Besides, the version of Tom Wilkinson’s President Lyndon B. Johnson is very good (“Selma (2014) Full Cast & Crew”). In the movie, President Lyndon B. Johnson became one of resistance of the bill advancing because the movie showed that the right to vote was not his primary political issues and goals, and he thought that Martin Luther King, Jr.’s movement hindered his agenda. However, he started to support what Martin Luther King, Jr. did and said after hearing the criticism and encouragement from Martin Luther King, Jr. In my opinion, Wilkinson did a great job of playing his version of President Lyndon B. Johnson. I think the President actually wanted to pass the legislation, but he did not have enough power to do it, and Martin Luther King, Jr. gave him the power or enlarged his power to pass the bill. Furthermore, there were a lot of powerful supporting actors, such as the film producer Oprah played a supporting character who wanted to vote, but could not vote in the movie. Also, Cuba Gooding Jr. acted a lawyer who only showed up twice in the movie. Even though there are many famous actors who played supporting characters in the movie, I think they did a good job to expressing each character’s emotions, and I respect them. Therefore, this movie Selma has a group of powerful and famous actors, and they all did a good job to perform in this movie. The movie Selma is an amazing movie, and it made a lot of people feel touched. When I went into the theater, there were a lot of African Americans and a few white people, and there were some Asian people like me. I could not pay my attention at the beginning of the movie because an African American little girl who sat in the front row kept laughing. When Tim Roth showed up at the scene, she laughed even harder than before. I did not know this girl, and I had no idea what she laughed about. Suddenly, I heard an old man walked up to her and said to the little girl, “Little girl, you better be quiet. I have been waiting this movie for many years.” I could feel how much the old man cared about this movie, and I knew that he really wanted to watch this movie carefully and intently. Also, I was glad that the little girl did not laugh again, so I could pay my attention on the movie. After two and a half hours, the movie ended with John Legend’s new song Glory, which was a nice song because I think this song helped me understand the feelings of the movie better. Suddenly, I saw the old man stood up, and he said out loud, “Remember Michael Brown, Remember Eric Garner. Our parade is not over yet.” I did not know this old man, and I did not really pay attention to what he said about. I thought this movie encouraged him something. Later, I did some research about what the old man said, and I found out that the two names that he mentioned were two African Americans who were dead because of some unfair reasons. Therefore, this movie made people sympathy because some people knew the feeling of inequality of people of color; also, I am an Asian, and some white people have treated me unfairly or looked down at me. This amazing movie not only made people touched, but also made me sympathy. In fact, I cried and laughed while I was watching the movie. Sometimes, there were funny scenes and dialogues that made me laugh right after some scenes made me cried. The reason I became sympathy about this movie is not only because of its powerful speech and memorable scenes, but also because I could directly feel the sadness, fear, anger, or determinations of the characters in the movie. I could see the struggles of how people fought for their freedom and equality and the feeling of how they really wanted the right to vote and freedom. Each actor put lots of emotions and effort to perform the characters, and each staff who worked behind the scenes tried their best to produce an amazing movie. Also, the background music helped me a lot to understand the feelings of the scenes. Therefore, staffs and actors put a lot of efforts into the movie, and they produced a wonderful movie that truly expresses the emotions of each character in the movie., which made me touched. From my point of view, I think people should go to watch this movie Selma because of its story, a group of powerful actors who accomplished their tasks on performing each character, and a group of staffs who put many efforts into the movie. This movie talked about an important political history that Martin Luther King, Jr. led a group of people to fight for the right to vote and freedom of African American. Also, there were a lot of powerful and famous actors who played main or supporting characters in the movie, and all of them perfectly accomplished their jobs to express each character’s feeling. Furthermore, staffs behind the scenes put music, set up the scenes, and edited the movie in order to make the movie powerful and emotional. Therefore, I think this movie is a very meaningful movie, and we should produce more movies like Selma. Work Cited“Selma (2014) Full Cast & Crew” Imdb. IMDb.com, Inc., 2014. Web. 14 March 2015.
After watching the film, I was particularly(特别是) impressed by Martin Luther King, who was heavily punched(被击打) by white people when he first arrived in Selma. We may not have experienced racial discrimination (种族歧视)in our lives, but the inequality(不平等) and discrimination(歧视) of white people against black people shown in the film makes the audience outrage.As for Martin Luther King, I think he was great. He was not afraid of threats(威胁), nor did he give in to insults(侮辱). His speech was impassioned(慷慨激昂的) and inspiring(鼓舞人心的).Born man, who is no more than one noble(高贵), who is no less than one lowly. This movie is true and profound(深刻的), which makes me look forward to the world of freedom(自由) and equality(平等)forever. (暑假作业,请见谅)
Selma是Alabama的一个小镇的名字,是当年马丁·路德·金(MLK)领导的为黑人投票权而游行的起始地,是The Voting Rights Act (投票权法案)这一关键联邦法律的得到通过的动力之一。
这部片子的上映实在是不能再合时宜了。
首先是以John Roberts为首的最高法院在几个月前废除了The Voting Rights Act里面几个关键的条例,其理由竟然是盲目的“现在南方各州已无种族压迫或歧视,少数种族的人们已不再需要联邦法保护。
” 接着是不断涌现的无辜黑人公民被警察草率处决的事件(Michael Brown,Eric Garner),以及纽约的两位警察刚刚被谋杀的事件。
纷纷上街的人数逐渐增加,而改变的前景却不容乐观。
人们很迷惘很沮丧。
美国的人权的现况在明显的倒退。
在太平洋的另一边,一场小火也奄奄一息。
Selma及时的出现了,在大荧幕上带领我们回到了那个媒体技术刚刚起步的时代,一个人们冒着生命危险上街的时代。
它在大处讲述了MLK 为了呼吁国会通过保护黑人投票权的法案而做出的台前幕后的努力,从小处也对事件一些关键当事人——MLK及他的妻子,总统LBJ,Alabama州长George Wallace,当时随MLK游行的现任国会议员John Lewis等等——进行了聚焦,不仅刻骨展现了演讲、游行造势、以及警方残暴镇压的大场面,也非常生动的刻画了不同立场的各方(MLK的非暴力运动、学生领袖们、Malcolm X领导的暴力反抗组织、LBJ的白宫、Alabama的GW和Selma的警长)之间的政治纠葛。
这部电影非常精彩,进电影院的时候眼睛很累,进了之后才发现自己买的是IMAX第二排,庆幸的是电影院很人性化,第二排离荧幕有足够的距离,电影从头到尾都吸引人,眼泪也让眼珠更舒服了些,看着看着就一点都不累了。
整部电影的演员表其实非常强大,但它却是不声不响的来到美国大众面前的。
David Oyelowo饰演MLK,让我一时记不起真正的MLK的外表和谈吐是怎样的了。
他并没有特别细致的临摹MLK,但是他在演讲中的感染力和气势都有MLK的灵魂,也让我听到了以前不曾察觉的愤怒。
而在一些台下的戏里,他对于小细节的处理也非常逼真,使得MLK成为了一个生动的人,而没有停留于一个高大上的印象。
George Wallace竟然是Tim Roth饰演的,一上来我有些吃惊,但是他将这个人物的可恨演得非常成功,他的台词说的也很好,有些荒唐的台词让人不得不笑。
Tom Wilkinson饰演的这个版本的LBJ也很好。
电影中将LBJ总统刻画成了法案推进中的阻力之一:电影中投票权并不是他的首要政治议题和目标,他觉得MLK的运动阻碍了他的议程,是在MLK不断的批评和激励之下才最终发表演说支持他。
这可能不符合史实,我认为如果可以将LBJ更积极参与的一面放进剧本,电影的意义可能更大,尤其是当今民族融合出现裂痕的时候。
但剧本要造势也是情有可原。
无论如何,Wilkinson出色的完成了饰演这个版本的总统的任务,将LBJ口无遮拦满嘴脏话让人发笑的一面、以及他在政治上的立场和他对立法困境的头痛都表现了出来。
我看完并没有觉得LBJ是不想立法,是他真的没有足够的筹码,而最终还是MLK给他增加了筹码。
小配角们的表演也很好,制片人Oprah 饰演一个没有多少词的想要投票却投不了的小角色,她出镜的第一场戏从让人紧张到让人愤怒,非常动人。
饰演小配角的有大牌(比如Cuba Gooding Jr.饰演一个只有两场戏的律师,Martin Sheen也只演一个在那两场戏里出现的法官,Dylan Baker演J. Edgar Hoover,还有Rapper Common、The Wire的Wendell Pierce等等),也有小牌(Marmen Ejogo饰演MLK妻子Correta,Stephan James演现任议员John Lewis、Short Term 12的Keith Stanfield饰演Jimmie Lee Jackson)。
所有这些人的表演都值得尊重。
影片的感情很充沛,如果不反抗的话,两行泪迹是免不了的。
但同时剧本里也有些让人发笑的台词和情节,有时眼泪还没干就哈哈大笑了。
影片激发的感动是超越了种族的,因为影片中既不过度向自由派白人鞠躬,也不忽视超越种族的信仰的力量。
它使人感动的不仅仅是演说和压迫的大场面,它将片中人物的伤心、恐惧、愤怒、坚定、决心统统的传播给你,让人感受到的是那份对自由和平等的向往,对无理强权的绝望和抗争,对现实的反思,以及跟荧幕上角色和自己周围的观众对于一种信念的分享和彼此的精神拥抱。
虽然少数场景中犯了用音乐告诉你应该怎么感受的老毛病,但整体上观众还是有不加烹饪的、赤裸裸的情感反馈的。
这不仅是一部让自由派的人很受激励、让种族歧视的人很愤怒的感情造势上很成功的电影,它还是一部纯粹的好电影。
那些当年说Fruitvale Station是liberal propaganda的人,其中有些可能也饶不过这部影片。
但他们忽略了Fruitvale要讲的是什么,忽略了此片要讲的是什么。
有些人出国几年,听了一些美国极右派的论点,觉得正好可以扶持自己的偏见和恐惧,便马上采纳将自己武装起来,哪里可以出头就去哪里叫两句。
如今这种行为已经不再新鲜,已经让人觉得无聊了。
我去的这场放映非常有意思,现场黑人居多,白人也有,我这种亚洲人也不少。
电影一开场第一句话,我就没听到,因为坐在我前面第一排的一黑人小姑娘不能克制的哈哈大笑起来。
除非一位刚进来的老爷爷摸黑坐到了她的大腿上,我想不到任何她这样笑的理由。
而电影进行中Tim Roth出场的一刹那,她又发起了诡异的大笑,貌似还笑得喘不上气了。
我不认识这个女孩,姑且把她当成所谓帮倒忙的队友,为种族歧视提供借口的那种队友,但其实我们每一种团体里都能找到这种队友。
在她第二次大笑的时候,我正前方的一位老人一个箭步冲到她面前,指着她说,“小姐,我等了几十年就为了看这部电影,你最好给我安静点”,马上让她闭了嘴。
影片结束,伴着Common和John Legend的新曲Glory(歌词里还提到Ferguson)老人振臂举起左拳,并在结束后起立面对观众高呼:“记住Michael Brown,记住Eric Garner,我们的游行还没有结束!
” 我不了解这个老人,但我愿意相信他代表了某种脊梁,任何一个团体也都需要这种脊梁。
影片要大家做的其实很简单,而且其实在重复几十年前To Kill A Mockingbird里面告诉大家的东西:You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view... Until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it. (除非你站在另一个人的立场上想问题,你永远无法理解她…你得穿上她的皮肤走上两遭。
)同情心和同理心——这就是电影让我们去拥抱的。
因为有些时候,套用电影The Interview里那句无厘头的真理——"They Hate Us 'Cuz They Ain't Us. (他们恨我们就因为他们不是我们)."这个道理讲了几十年,却依然需要讲,就说明Selma这部电影是有存在的必要性的。
看完的第一感受是非常平和,这种平和在一部描述黑人平权的电影中能体现出来非常难得。
我们可以经常在网上看到许多关于黑人,同志,变性这些话题的讨论,美国最高法院也做出了同性恋婚姻合法的判决,我觉得这种现象非常好,很多生活在社会角落的人得到了承认,但是我看这部电影关注的不是塞尔玛这个事件的本身,而是电影对于这件事的表述手法,以一种娓娓道来,心平气和,不煽情,不做作的方式表现出来的历史态度,同时这是一位43岁的女导演的作品,我为这样睿智,大气的女导演鼓掌。
人不是神,不可能完美,电影中的马丁不完美,有心计,会出轨,但却最真实,他一定知道游行会有这样的后果,同样他也知道这样才能赢得舆论,获得关注,可以说是他把这些人送到对手的棍棒下,当然他们的牺牲赢得了民主的胜利,那么不把马丁路德金描述成一个完美的英雄,而是真实还原一个肉身的马丁,这一点本身就很难得,一个美国记者说,不感恩戴德是一个强大民族的性格,这部电影对马丁的刻画也表现了这位女导演成熟的电影态度。
影片中马丁非暴力的游行方式和整部电影的基调是吻合的,就是一种平和,不激进。
看完这部电影没有痛哭流涕或者震撼人心,但是电影表现出来的理智让我非常赞赏。
另外我想起梅厄夫人在联合国关于以色列建国时的演讲,她不是在哭诉犹太人这些年来的悲惨遭遇,而是把重点放在这个民族是如何在苦难中艰难前行,顽强生存的一面,博得别人的同情是最坏的一张牌,赢得别人的尊重是最好的一张牌。
赶上BLM于是Amazon Prime限免。
本来以为是个如《林肯》一般令人昏昏欲睡的片子但是看了10分钟之后发现完全不是那么回事。
本片没有小马丁路德金牧师(以下简称MLK)塑造成一个高大全形象,从一个胜利走向另一个胜利,反倒是化了不少时间拍MLK如何沮丧退缩徘徊艰难地向妻子坦白出轨,使得人物形象更丰富也更真实。
本片也是一部美国黑人如何争取投票权的简史。
理论上美国宪法第十三修正案赋予黑人投票权但是南方州用人头税和教育测试。
片中阿拉巴马州SELMA一个黑人大妈去注册投票,注册员先是让她背宪法序言然后再问阿拉巴马总共有几个县,大妈都答上来了结果再被刁难说要把县治安官的名字一个个都报出来。
另一方面因为黑人没有投票权州一级行政立法司法机构都被白人种族主义者把持,针对黑人的种族仇杀层出不穷,如电影里表现的伯明翰四女孩。
看片的时候可能要了解一下知识背景。
于是为了争取关注MLK组织了从SELMA到阿拉巴马首府蒙哥马利的进军以推动赋予黑人实质投票权的立法。
影片展现MLK如何动员,如何协调组织内部的分歧,如何将暴行展示在媒体尤其是电视媒体前,如何同更激进的Malcolm X分进合击,如何预演可能遇到的冲突,如何争取总统林登约翰逊(LBJ),如何争取国际同情,如何在法院挑战对行军的禁令,如何唤起白人尤其是宗教人士的支持和加入,如何认怂,如何安排后勤保障,如何安排医疗救护。
有勇有谋,简直如百科全书一般。
电影里MLK问LBJ,为啥美国能派成千上万的人去越南打仗,却无法派军队去阿拉巴马保护美国人民,LBJ哑口无言。
60年代民权运动之所以能取得胜利,跟美军深陷越战泥潭不无关系。
最后要说的是MLK的演说真的是很富有感染力,比后来那位同肤色的诺贝尔和平奖得主也就强个几十倍吧。
记得是在看转播的奥斯卡颁奖,表演了电影《塞尔玛》的原创歌曲《Glory》,黑人演员们重现了毅然决然的走过大桥时的坚定与勇气,气势磅礴,歌曲结束全场起立鼓掌,扮演剧中马丁路德金的演员泪流满面。
后来过了好久找了电影来看,前前后后看了三遍,永远都无法忘记,居住在塞尔玛的黑人居民,明知道走过大桥,桥的那一端就是人间炼狱,等待他们的是警棍,是催泪瓦斯,是令所有人都无法容忍的滔天罪行,甚至是死亡,但是他们还是坚定的走了过去。
这个场景至今无法忘记。
《塞尔玛》。
《塞尔玛游行》影片讲述了60年代,在塞尔玛市黑人受到的不公的待遇,这其实是全美国的问题,影片集中在黑人对待公交车上不公平的政策出现了大游行。
马丁-路德金博士身为民权运动的代表人物,自然成了黑人领袖,他一直致力于黑人受歧视的努力,他发表过的《我有一个梦想》的演讲,使他上了《时代周刊》,获得了诺贝尔和平奖。
他主张非暴力游行,不对抗,静坐的方式,深受甘地的影响。
他主张黑人具有投票权,只要有了投票权,有了公民权力,才能保护黑人的自由,不受不公平法案限制。
据说,在1955年,一位黑人妇女因在公交车上不给白人让座,被法庭判了两年监禁,一系列的事件,引起了马丁-路德金参与了黑人运动。
经过努力,最终,约翰逊总统通过了法案,至此,黑人才终于有了选举权,可惜,马丁-路德金在1968年遭暗杀,享年39岁,美国人也投桃送李,每年都有马丁-路德金纪念日,在2011年还给他在国会前做了雕塑,之前只有华盛顿,林肯,罗斯福等总统才有的规格。
正得不得了的传记+历史的美国主旋律电影,当历史科普教材看还是不错。
几段演讲都挺赞的,无论是金的缅怀,鼓动,振臂还是州长的偏激,总统的淡定都各有风格,演讲调子和节奏有种歌唱的味道我走偏了。
还是由衷尊敬民权斗士,无论这句话看上去有多虚幻,有些事情远在天边近在眼前,真切感受过才知道可贵。
历史传记题材电影《塞尔玛》由阿娃·杜威内执导,蒂姆·罗斯、大卫·奥伊罗、小库珀·古丁、汤姆·威尔金森主演,影片聚焦美国民权斗士马丁·路德·金1965年组织的“由塞尔玛向蒙哥马利进军”行动。
我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了
1,金博士的演講煽動能力無人能及;2,沒有三權分立的制度,他沒有膽量對總統那麽強悍;3,民權運動要成功,得先有一個制度做保障,否則,分分鐘把你關進大牢,以山巔的名義摧毀你易如反掌。
一年一部的黑人题材主旋律。
拖了好久才慢慢拖完,看的太累了
电影里塑造的金更具神性而非人性,甚至影响其伟光正形象的婚外情都处理地小心翼翼,说过于主旋律真的一点都不冤
尽管全片对赛尔玛大游行的再现极其生动且感人,但仍然不能掩盖角色塑造的单薄乏力,为数不多的几个配乐场景的煽情用力过猛。三星半
国外也是有主旋律电影的
性生活糜烂一带而过还否认。。。就凭这个就差评。更不用说论文抄袭了!就电影画面来说拍的很好,镜头挺不错!
电影推进很仓促 表现力和感染力不强 以及在b站上搜到资源的神翻译也是无语了
Soon and very soon.
聚焦美国民权运动史上重要的塞尔玛游行,以小见大、深沉有力。男主角的表演更是丝丝入扣。女性导演的风格细腻有余,力度不足,对某些历史人物的刻画略有主观化之嫌。在50年后的今天看此片,政治意义仍然完全盖过了艺术价值,这是时代的悲哀。
马丁路德金像神一样,sheriff则坏到之后的不幸都被暗示是命运的惩罚。这种题材本就不追求什么立体人物,要的就是正义战胜邪恶的崇高与澎湃。不过脸谱化也算是一种历史的审判
这样一个事件 这么多群演 竟然能拍得这么平庸直白无聊 真是天理难容
不好意思我没能清醒着看完。。。智商不够
在好几部美剧里被吐槽的一塌糊涂哈哈
2015.07.01中规中矩的手法,四平八稳的风格,但这个题材实在让人没有抵抗力。或许本片做了不少刻意的取舍,或许部分人物塑造有脸谱化、简单化之嫌,但这是一段值得讲述的历史,不仅美国人需要聆听,世界上每个享受基本权益、捍卫基本权益、争取基本权益的人也都应该了解它。
给抗争者高分,们利用你的恐惧,
整部片子看下来,几乎是热泪盈眶。在这种冷兵器时代,个人或者弱势全体如何对抗一个全副武装,且意识形态保守的暴力机构(政府)。老实说,美国不是一个强权政府,但所谓民主,又仅仅只是写在宪法里?它是需要一代又一代人去争取。看到这里,以后的路,显然也是有了答案。
煽情的地方的确感动,但也仅此而已,不过是中规中矩的主旋律
想了解黑人投票权是怎么回事的可以看看这部。精彩描述了如何组织一场运动,没有同类题材电影的可以煽情和一味卖惨。马鬃免费看。
不知为何,我就是特别不喜欢